big brother bookkeeping(From thoughts that began collecting in my 1995 journal.)

In Luke 15:2, the Pharisees register a complaint against Jesus: “This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.” Included in Jesus’ response to the leaders’ disapproval is the beloved parable of the lost son.

Consider the big brother’s perspective if the story were set in our day. Little brother takes off with his portion of the father’s estate.

It was premature.

It was rude.

But it was his share.

The elder brother is angered not by the return of his little brother, but by the father’s response to that return.

If the father were willing to accept the youngest back on his stated terms—“I am no longer worthy to be called your son; make me like one of your hired men”— the elder brother might have thought, “fair enough.”

But to receive the younger brother back as a son with all honors and privileges—that was too much. That was painfully unfair.

Reading the story, I began to think of what I will call “big brother bookkeeping”: spiritual and moral accounting that is precise and accurate and one-dimensional.

It records actions but not attitude, deeds but not heart.

Debits and credits are made and paid through works alone.

But Father God’s bookkeeping is not limited to one-dimension: it records action and attitude, deed and heart, works and motivation.

By the father’s books, both sons were in the red.

The eldest son displayed right actions, but they were motivated by duty not by honor and love: “Look! All these years I’ve been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders.” (Luke 15.29)

The younger blatantly chose disrespectful actions and attitudes: “The younger son got together all he had, set off for a distant country and there squandered his wealth in wild living.” (Luke 15:13)

In the eyes of the eldest son who kept one-dimensional records, it was entirely unreasonable for the father to even remotely show favor to a son before he had at the very least “made good” on his debt through restitution. Receiving him coolly as a slave would have been just. But embracing and giving gifts and celebrating the return of one with an impossible debt seemed shockingly unjust and inconsistent.

Big brother bookkeeping struggles to make the acquaintance of grace.

Additionally, for the big brother, the injustice was not solely that the father celebrated the younger son’s return, but that the father had never celebrated the eldest son’s—whose works account balance was certainly higher—presence and “goodness.” (Luke 15:29-30)

The eldest’s anger no doubt appeared reasonable to the religious leaders, some of whom adhered to big brother bookkeeping. Perhaps what was bothering the Pharisees, whose question the parable addresses, was not only that Jesus was choosing to eat with sinners, but that Jesus was choosing to eat with sinners instead of with them. If Jesus really was from God, would not he be just and fair and reward the Pharisees for their “goodness” by spending his time with them instead of with all these sinners? Why was Jesus celebrating the presence of hopelessly indebted sinners more than the presence of the obviously “righteous” religious?

prodigal sonIn the midst of his wanderings, the youngest son stumbled upon a truth that the eldest son could not comprehend: “Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.” (Luke 15:21) Grace rises to greet sincere and sober estimations of our sinfulness. None of us on our own are worthy of being called God’s sons.

Whether the elder or the younger, the contentment that grows in a contrite heart can ward off big brother bookkeeping. Father’s estate is limitless. His infinite resources are un-depletable. Through the cross, our inheritance is assured. When we align ourselves with big brother bookkeeping we harden the very thing God calls us to guard: our hearts.

And when we rejoice with God over the return of little brothers, we celebrate the grace by which we all—elder and younger—stand.

Pin It on Pinterest